From bswagner at calpoly.edu Fri Jun 1 01:45:18 2007 From: bswagner at calpoly.edu (Red Wagner) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 01:45:18 -0700 Subject: [CPLUG Chatter] chatter useful? Message-ID: Is this list useful? chatter hasn't seen a lot of use, but it seems like it would be worthwhile for things which are club related but not linux or official meeting related. In the past people have used this list to solicit roommates, post job offers, or put up some obscure machine for sale. I'd like to see the separation between the two lists, but it doesn't seem like people have been using it recently to the point where it may not be worth maintaining. Thoughts? -Red -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kworth at gmail.com Fri Jun 1 12:58:05 2007 From: kworth at gmail.com (Kevin Worth) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 12:58:05 -0700 Subject: [CPLUG Chatter] chatter useful? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Personally I subscribed to all three lists just to make sure I got everything, but I think that for the most part the CPLUG list is fairly low-volume and doesn't necessarily need entirely separate lists for on and off-topic stuff. Perhaps people could just use courtesy to title their emails with "[Off-topic]" or something? -CK On 6/1/07, Red Wagner wrote: > Is this list useful? > > chatter hasn't seen a lot of use, but it seems like it would be worthwhile > for things which are club related but not linux or official meeting related. > > In the past people have used this list to solicit roommates, post job > offers, or put up some obscure machine for sale. I'd like to see the > separation between the two lists, but it doesn't seem like people have been > using it recently to the point where it may not be worth maintaining. > > Thoughts? > > -Red > > _______________________________________________ > Chatter mailing list > Chatter at lists.cplug.org > http://lists.cplug.org/mailman/listinfo/chatter > > From bswagner at calpoly.edu Fri Jun 1 20:06:07 2007 From: bswagner at calpoly.edu (Red Wagner) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 20:06:07 -0700 Subject: [CPLUG Chatter] chatter useful? In-Reply-To: <806440.17023.qm@web59003.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <806440.17023.qm@web59003.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: > We started chatter@ because some people were getting annoyed at the > "off-topic" discussion going on on cplug@ > Even though traffic is low on both lists, I think its good to keep > chatter at . It doesn't seem to be hurting anything to keep it around. > > On that note, have you guys seen Everybody loves Eric Raymond? > http://geekz.co.uk/lovesraymond It wasn't until I saw that link that I understood the true reason for this list's existence. BTW, check out this video of potential interview questions for web developers, with broader applicability to coding jobs in general: http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2006/11/110906.html -Red -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kworth at gmail.com Sat Jun 2 00:10:23 2007 From: kworth at gmail.com (Kevin Worth) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 00:10:23 -0700 Subject: [CPLUG Chatter] chatter useful? In-Reply-To: References: <806440.17023.qm@web59003.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: haha that is awesome... I agree with Red- it proves that this list should exist. On 6/1/07, Red Wagner wrote: > > > We started chatter@ because some people were getting annoyed at the > "off-topic" discussion going on on cplug@ > > Even though traffic is low on both lists, I think its good to keep > chatter at . It doesn't seem to be hurting anything to keep it around. > > > > On that note, have you guys seen Everybody loves Eric Raymond? > > http://geekz.co.uk/lovesraymond > > > It wasn't until I saw that link that I understood the true reason for this > list's existence. > > BTW, check out this video of potential interview questions for web > developers, with broader applicability to coding jobs in general: > http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2006/11/110906.html > > -Red > > > > _______________________________________________ > Chatter mailing list > Chatter at lists.cplug.org > http://lists.cplug.org/mailman/listinfo/chatter > > From farktronix at yahoo.com Fri Jun 1 19:33:43 2007 From: farktronix at yahoo.com (Jacob Farkas) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 19:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [CPLUG Chatter] chatter useful? Message-ID: <806440.17023.qm@web59003.mail.re1.yahoo.com> We started chatter@ because some people were getting annoyed at the "off-topic" discussion going on on cplug@ Even though traffic is low on both lists, I think its good to keep chatter at . It doesn't seem to be hurting anything to keep it around. On that note, have you guys seen Everybody loves Eric Raymond? http://geekz.co.uk/lovesraymond Jacob On Jun 1, 2007, at 1:45 AM, "Red Wagner" wrote: Is this list useful? chatter hasn't seen a lot of use, but it seems like it would be worthwhile for things which are club related but not linux or official meeting related. In the past people have used this list to solicit roommates, post job offers, or put up some obscure machine for sale. I'd like to see the separation between the two lists, but it doesn't seem like people have been using it recently to the point where it may not be worth maintaining. Thoughts? -Red _______________________________________________ Chatter mailing list Chatter at lists.cplug.org http://lists.cplug.org/mailman/listinfo/chatter ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469